Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Shyheels

Legs-it Headline

Recommended Posts

I worry about the prospects for Brexit. 

I see the likes of Gina Miller are proclaiming the election result as a victory for the remain camp, a rejection of a hard Brexit by the voters. In point of fact, Brexit scarcely figured in the campaign - Labour was all about social services, tax and spend, and the Tories scarcely campaigned at all.

No matter what spin anyone wants to put on it, this was a public humiliation for Theresa May and the Conservatives and May's personal standing at the negotiating table is much diminished as a result. The EU negotiators will know this, and play to that weakness (as anyone would in their position) while the makeshift alliance forged with the DUP will create enough shifting sands and potential for ambiguity at home to undermine any strong stance she might care to take on Brexit. Make no bones about it, the remainers will see themselves as very much on the ascendant and May will not have a strong enough position to contain them.

 

Edited by Shyheels

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If I heard rightly, the DUP are okay for a hard Brexit. They will doubtless vie for the sort of funding package Scotland currently enjoys.

Time to play the waiting game. Boris Johnson (traitorous turncoat) is eyeing up Mays job, but I think she'll find enough support to stay in place. The country has had enough of turmoil. No more referendums, no more elections, no more changes of in leadership. It's important the EU sees that May can keep her job too. Unlike Cameron, I think May is not a quitter. And as I said before, we are too close to the start of the negotiations for change anyway. You may not like it, some of the Tory party may not like it, but what we have now, is what we'll have for the next 5 years.

The only way Brexit is in danger, is if Tory Europhiles stab their own party in the back. That would be a self-destructive move, as an early election, really would give us a Labour government. Corbyn's ego is about to compete with the moon so I'm hoping he will get enough rope to hang himself with his 'spend spend spend' initiative. The Tories must now look at changing the funding regime at universities, to pull the rug from under the Labour party, and bring the elderly back into the fold with their care and pension packages. 

I'm going to have a couple of prescription tranquillisers, and a lie down. My nerves are in shreds. ;) :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tory Europhiles are quite capable of stabbing their own party in the back. Europhiles in general have but one true loyalty and that is to the "European project". 

As to May, she might linger for a while but she's made an awful lot of enemies with this ill considered election and wooden campaign. She owns this mess, along with Davis and a couple of inside advisors. No way known she'll be at Number 10 for another five years, or even one. There's too much rank-and-file party room hate floating around, and what's more, she's burned her credibility and standing beyond her ability to retrieve them. She's damaged goods and widely perceived as such, in the U.K. and in the EU. She'll go. I am sure there are half a dozen people tonight plotting their courses of action and quietly starting the business of shoring up support. 

Edited by Shyheels

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't 'do' politics [see piece above] - and I deplore the poor grammar of that expression too.   But, as someone shaken by what has happened (quite aside from my political leanings, such as they are), I have to commend Freddy for some insightful comments which I consider have put things into sharp focus.   In particular, I think he is dead right that Corbyn was very ready to promise the earth in the clear knowledge that he would not be called upon to deliver it - regardless of some very dubious costings.   And, in doing so, he succeeded in convincing a large section of the population - and particularly students - that his was the one true path.   And Freddy rightly identifies that at least one worthwhile result of the election has been the emasculation of the SNP and its gorgeous stiletto-wearing leaderene, leaving the United Kingdom to concentrate on more important cross-border matters.

I am no tactician or diplomat and I do not pretend to understand the dirty game that underlies most political activity.   But I cannot see how we could have another election within the foreseeable future without the liklihood of shifting the present position even further to the left.   Many, of course, would welcome that and press for it - but if the Conservatives are to avoid further humiliation and potential defeat they must surely regroup and, much as Freddy suggests, introduce (and not just promise) measures which will fairly address the concerns of students, pensioners and the sick without bankrupting the country - or completely screwing middle-England, along with those 'fat cats' who have not by then emigrated.     We shall see ...

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm trying hard to stop myself being upset by the GE results and the ruptions within the winning political party. It will be the second time in a year they have suffered a shocking surprise, and you'd think they'd have learned to handle it better by now.....

The absolutely last thing the Tory party needs, is the upheaval of a change in leadership. The VERY last thing this country needs, is a change in our country's leadership. As with the Tory party, the country has had enough of change. Teresa May got 2M more votes than Cameron, and the Tories were happy with the result he got. Time to move on. Time to move forward. B)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I read again, Trump is in the do-do. (Is he ever out of it?)

I heard again today, "will he get assassinated"?

Things must be bad, if people in the general populace dislike someone so much, they are looking for their removal by the use of violence. :huh:

Surely, he must resign or be impeached. His tenancy in the White House is a mockery, to democracy, humanity, and America.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't be at all surprised if he was impeached. Indeed I'll be surprised if he's not. He seems to have no concept of ethics, the law, or the dignity of his office.

I would be stunned - and sickened - if anything physical happened to him, though. Won't happen. 

Edited by Shyheels

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, FastFreddy2 said:

I read again, Trump is in the do-do. (Is he ever out of it?)

I heard again today, "will he get assassinated"?

Things must be bad, if people in the general populace dislike someone so much, they are looking for their removal by the use of violence. :huh:

Surely, he must resign or be impeached. His tenancy in the White House is a mockery, to democracy, humanity, and America.

 

4 hours ago, Shyheels said:

I wouldn't be at all surprised if he was impeached. Indeed I'll be surprised if he's not. He seems to have no concept of ethics, the law, or the dignity of his office.

I would be stunned - and sickened - if anything physical happened to him, though. Won't happen. 

Leaving aside what Trump has actually said, done or threatened, I find both incredible and frightening the power apparently vested in one person as President.   He seems to be able to do whatever he wants with little or no direct and immediate means of keeping him in check - more a dictator than the head of a democracy.   Could he actually press the nuclear button on his own initiative?   If so, heaven help us all!

As an aside, there are three things that irritate me whenever I see him and which seem to sum up his falseness:   (i) putting his hand over his heart when making a solemn declaration (which appears to be the American way); (ii) saluting military officers when he is not himself either in the military (except, nominally, as commander-in-chief) or in uniform; (ii) that peculiar up-and-down arm gesture with his encircled right finger and thumb when he is emphasising a point - probably a 'BS is active' indicator.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He is objectionable on many grounds. I've lost count of them.

The president of the US is indeed a very powerful individual, but the US constitution has seen to it that the president does not have unfettered power, although Trump seems to believe that it does. In this he is wrong and is finding these things out the hard way and getting grumpier by the day about it. If you'll note, Trump has not passed a single (major) piece of legislation since he became president (most of what he has passed has been things like bills to rename various Federal buildings etc) Nor can he declare war without the approval of congress. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Shyheels said:

I would be stunned - and sickened - if anything physical happened to him, though. Won't happen. 

With a population of close to 300 million, there might well be an individual who might consider the sacrifice of one life over 100's of thousands, or even millions, a worthy sacrifice to save so many others. Statistically, it would make sense. Many others have volunteered to make the same sacrifice for the same reason. Brave men though, which I doubt Trump is.

As Stalin would suggest, with so many people killed in the US (and many more in other South American countries) what difference would one life make to a statistic that usually sits in the tens of thousands? Especially if the loss of it saved the world from global war?

 

Trump is isolating himself from the people who could and would support his initiatives if he was more a politician, and less of an egotistical megalomaniac. He can't last the full term, as he has cuckolded himself. If he has any sense (unlikely) he will resign under the auspices that politicians "failed to see the need for change, and wouldn't support him". When in actual fact, he alienated anyone who would and could help.

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He'll never resign. 

I expect he will be impeached. The FBI investigation is no joking matter and I think he'll find himself in some serious legal/political hot water if he is not careful - although I suspect he's street smart enough to keep himself out of jail. His aides and son-in-law might not be so lucky, though.

I do think he will be impeached. And I think that could create problems. 

As for Trump starting wars, launching nukes...he really can't. He has, in a way, made himself irrelevant. The government and military and the constitution itself would not allow it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Shyheels said:

As for Trump starting wars, launching nukes...he really can't. He has, in a way, made himself irrelevant. The government and military and the constitution itself would not allow it.

He doesn't  have to start one, he only has to provoke NK enough so they make the first move or make sounds like they are about to. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

NK isn't really going to do any such thing. Their fearless leader enjoys being on the world stage and imagining himself to be a superpower.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, Shyheels said:

NK isn't really going to do any such thing. Their fearless leader enjoys being on the world stage and imagining himself to be a superpower.

Really?

I think you need to read more news/propaganda. The rest of the world doesn't share your confidence.... >> clicky <<  Neither do I.

Fat man if building and testing delivery vehicles. 'Rumour' has it, his minions have finally developed an atomic warhead small enough for the delivery vehicles to get to American soil. He has said he will destroy America, once he has the means, it will take a very diplomatic leader with large balls to stop American launching a preemptive strike.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We'll see.

Kim Jong Un is a self aggrandising fruitcake but he does have survival sense. He knows he would never survive a full on conflict with the US 

Nobody but the US is giving him any air time at all

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Shyheels said:

We'll see.

 

Even Trumps co-author think he's going to fall on his sword. Reported >> here <<

Although he has been saying that for some time ... :rolleyes:

Edited by FastFreddy2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He's way too much of narcissist...

The whole world will be wrong, he'll be right...

Edited by Shyheels

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Shyheels said:

He's way too much of narcissist...

The whole world will be wrong, he'll be right...

No wonder they got on back in the 80's .... 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another step closer to Brexit, achieved last night despite efforts from the dissenters. :)

It would seem the Labour Party is now as close to being a Marxist organisation as it has ever been. The media is currently reporting it wants to use an illegal cross-industry "General Strike" to attempt a downfall of the current government. Obviously, Marxists only want to use the ballot box, when they win when using it. Losing, at the ballot box, means circumventing democracy to cause general unrest and division. I have fairly strong socialist inclinations, but my attitude toward democracy trumps any interest I have in socialism. 

I am unsure how this situation will all pan out, but there is a growing consensus even amongst the Remainers (widely reported after recent polls) that we should leave the EU. It's almost advertised by the main dissenting party as "the third way",  since the dissenters have finally recognised that immigration may be one of the main drivers of the Leave campaign. (Who knew?) The suggestion for the 'third way' is that immigration might be restricted, and the UK stay part of the EU Single Market. Thing is, Merkel and her Commissar's sorry Commissioners, have said "free movement of people" is not negotiable. It's a fundamental part of the membership criteria for access to the Single Market. So put bluntly, there is no third way. :rolleyes:

Odd thing I found out a couple of days ago, the UK had the option of restricting immigration for 7 years after the old Soviet Bloc countries joined the EU. Most of the other member states took up that option, including Germany. The UK did not, which (seemingly) surprised many. At the time, the government of the day said the numbers that came here would not be significant .... Liars. "They" (Blair) is the author of Brexit, since it was his government that did not take up the restrictions, and allowed unfettered immigration, while at the same time reduced the funding to the NHS, schools, and other infrastructure that newcomers would need when they arrived. With no new housing plan for example, where were 2M newcomers to live? Rents have doubled, property prices have done the same. Why? Demand, with little or no new supply. Same with schools.

While much of Brexit will not undo the current shortfall in infrastructure, at least the tide of newcomers might be slowed down. Many of us hope..... :huh: 

Edited by FastFreddy2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...