Jump to content

Leaderboard


Popular Content

Showing most liked content since 09/18/2017 in all areas

  1. 1 point
    http://metro.co.uk/2017/08/30/i-dont-need-vogues-permission-to-wear-stilettos-men-in-heels-is-and-has-always-been-ok-6878051/
  2. 1 point
    My handicap is cash too! I know what you mean about the pleasure of ownership. Unlike some of my fellow pros, who seem happy to use their camera bodies to pound tent pegs, I take it easy on my gear as far as possible. Rrsearching more this morning - leaning towards the 5D IV now. Seems less of a one-trick pony...
  3. 1 point
    I mislaid a roll of black damp-proof membrane recently. Has anyone seen it?
  4. 1 point
    It’s really unfair on both sexes. Women labour under the apprehension that they must do all these things, while men are taught to believe that they can’t or shouldn’t.
  5. 1 point
    It was om HHP that I changed my Email account, not sure why now. It was to do with something else not HHP but by the time I got back onto HHP found I had been blocked.
  6. 1 point
    I really wish that I hadn't posted the pic of the girl in leather, given the rise in blood pressure that it caused you, dear reader. I have no idea who the girl is (if anyone) or what she might represent if identified, and I don't care. As I said before, I merely spotted a pic of an attractive female wearing some rather nice leather clothes and shoes who conveyed a look that combined smartness and sexiness. Provocative - yes, but only in the sense that it hinted at latent desire in a rather sultry way. And most women who make a reasonable attempt at 'dressing-up' (and not all do, alas) are surely attempting at least a little provocation? The top was scarcely indecent and the knee-length skirt, albeit partially unzipped, showed a lot less than many do - with the caveat already noted that it could be adjusted as would be appropriate (or not!). If that zip was either fully-down, or fully-up, we would likely be in a different realm - imagination is a fine thing but it can run away with its owner. (I'm reminded at this point of the schoolmaster who rebuked a boy thus: 'Stop whistling that filthy tune!'). For the record, I would be distinctly embarrassed to be seen out in an ordinary public setting with a female companion if she was really provocative/tarty in appearance (however one might define the boundaries of such a look). Most of the women in so-called reality shows (not that I am a fan) provide examples. But I wouldn't consider that the girl in my pic has crossed that line. And certainly not as closely as do skin-tight latex or PVC skirts or dresses, even if showing no thigh (see examples above), or wet-look leggings. And conceivably - now there's a word to ponder - my opinion of any of these women would change for the worse when she opened her mouth - and I'm referring to how she spoke and what she might say - or if her conduct was in any way raunchy. Time for a cold shower, methinks.
  7. 1 point
    On a subject more germane to this thread, here’s this from the CNN website: http://edition.cnn.com/style/article/the-adorned-nange-magro/index.html
  8. 1 point
×