Jump to content

Something special


Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, Puffer said:

Are you sure?   I'd never heard of HD and, looking at what is online, she doesn't seem to resemble much the pic I posted above - which seems to show a much more attractive and less artificial woman than HD's pics reveal.   (And I doubt very much whether HD is '100% woman' - at least 10% of her is silicone!) 

yep.  she's a full time model & instagram queen.  She has 1001 "looks" so obviously not all photos are going to resemble yours. many of them do though, including the slight 'asian' look that she sometimes has.  the look that had Freddy thinking back to his ''holidays' in Bangkok  :D

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, euchrid said:

She's Holly Deacon---

https://www.instagram.com/hollydeacon/?hl=en

100% woman, so you can fap away with impunity.  Sorry she isn't to your "taste" Freddy :o:lol:

 

14 hours ago, FastFreddy2 said:

Nope .... Just thought I'd mention it ... In case anyone was getting 'carried away' .... ;) :D

I can't imagine a more 'perfect' looking set of legs, standing underneath a slim/trim body. Things that look too good to be true, usually are. :(

I have no idea how "I can't imagine a more "perfect" looking set of legs" could be interpreted to mean I don't like them? They are stunning. 

 

 

3 hours ago, euchrid said:

yep.  she's a full time model & instagram queen.  She has 1001 "looks" so obviously not all photos are going to resemble yours. many of them do though, including the slight 'asian' look that she sometimes has.  the look that had Freddy thinking back to his ''holidays' in Bangkok  :D

 

I wish! ;) :D

 

Usually you 'nail' these obtuse enigma's but this time I'm not sure. (If anyone else had made the claim I would have given it no credit at all.) 

Looking back at Puffer's original, I immediately noticed the boyish tummy. It's not big, but it suggests one more rib than woman usually have. The backside is a nice shape, but the bum/hips are slim, not usually seen on a woman, and certainly not on a Western woman unless she's from Poland.

The lips on the original are almost full, but not overly so. Those on H.D. are positively pneumatic, and her nose is very long/straight which is doubtless that way due to the plastic in it.  Which leads us on to the photo style of DH which appears to be a "tits and arse" show. (And why not?) And of the 4-500 photographs I browsed, none had 'legs' as a point of interest, but plenty were showing T+A which then also suggested a small waist? Something not seen in  the first image.

If that initial picture is one of DH, I would expect multiple 'hits' from Google, but nothing found?

 

At the moment (Watson), I remain unconvinced. :(

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, euchrid said:

i've changed my mind.  she's not Holly Deacon.

She's Brittany Hawks  https://www.instagram.com/brittany_hawks/?hl=en

 

8dcc45e7cc7a0bb1efaeb2c514dc75a7.jpg

 

Closer, but still no prize. :D Brittany has blue/grey eyes .... 

 

On 12/04/2018 at 1:44 PM, Puffer said:

I don't know who this is - and don't really care (unless she happens to live in the next street):

5ad17f334a777_tumblrlegsstillettoheels.thumb.jpg.4e0fd769b824424f12bb0e0e52a445c1.jpg

 

I'm not (yet) a member of 'tumblr', but I did try to look at the accounts of a few of those that are, who had "liked" this image. While at least one took me to porn, two others took me to fe(male) images .... I'm even more convinced 'we' are looking at someone with a full-set of ribs. ;)

Edited by FastFreddy2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 14/04/2018 at 5:03 AM, FastFreddy2 said:

 

Closer, but still no prize. :D Brittany has blue/grey eyes .... 

...

I'm not (yet) a member of 'tumblr', but I did try to look at the accounts of a few of those that are, who had "liked" this image. While at least one took me to porn, two others took me to fe(male) images .... I'm even more convinced 'we' are looking at someone with a full-set of ribs. ;)

I suggest that this correspondence should now cease, as:   (a) we are unlikely to establish with certainty who/what he/she/it truly is; (b) even if we do, none of us is ever likely to see/meet/shag him/her/it; (c) there are plenty more fish (genetically modified or not) in the sea. <_<

Now for a cold shower, whilst counting my blessings (and ribs) ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

why were we ever talking about ribs???  men & women both have 12 pairs.

The "Eve was made from one of Adam's ribs" biblical fable bears no relation to actual human biology.  Freddy presumably attended Sunday School in his formative years.

Copy/paste from somewhere online -

THIS MYTH ABOUT WOMEN'S RIBS PERSISTS.   In an effort to prove the Bible story of Eve as wrought from Adam's rib "true," pastors and Sunday School teachers sometimes pass along a tale that women have more ribs than men. It's not true. Gender plays no part in the number of ribs you have: It's 12 pairs for everyone. However, women's ribs are about 10 percent smaller in volume on average than men's ribs.

Oh, and also re. the grey/blue eyes thing: Contact lenses?  photoshop?  I still reckon Brittany is the match.  She has too many photos online to search but i bet that 'street shot' is on her website somewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mistaking smaller (-10%) for less, I thought women had fewer (for pregnancy). Oh well. :wacko:

And men often have ribs removed so they can attain a more feminine torso: Rodrigo Alves.

 

Anyway, if that image was anywhere other than hidden in a dark corner somewhere, Google/Bing/Pinterest would know about it. Rather like the images we post here. All available on a search. :huh:

 

Edited by FastFreddy2
Link added for Rodrigo Alves
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, FastFreddy2 said:

Anyway, if that image was anywhere other than hidden in a dark corner somewhere, Google/Bing/Pinterest would know about it. Rather like the images we post here. All available on a search. :huh:

 

I'm not sure that's at all correct.

Google Image, etc.are obviously quite clever technically, but they can be thrown off track by photo edits, changes to aspect ratio, addition of watermarks, cropping, colour tweaking, and so on.  TBO, I think Puffers "original" may have been photoshop-stretched since those lovely long legs do appear to be a bit too long to be "the real McCoy".

The original un-tampered photo probably exists all over the internet, however we don't have a copy of that one to use in our search requests. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, euchrid said:

Google Image, etc.are obviously quite clever technically, but they can be thrown off track by photo edits, changes to aspect ratio, addition of watermarks, cropping, colour tweaking, and so on.  TBO, I think Puffers "original" may have been photoshop-stretched since those lovely long legs do appear to be a bit too long to be "the real McCoy".

The original un-tampered photo probably exists all over the internet, however we don't have a copy of that one to use in our search requests. 

I agree, and maybe why that extra coloured block was put on the right of Puffers original. My version, has that removed. Here is a version with the image compressed. Any more compression and the image looked completely unnatural. 

 

 5ad4728993cd8_tumblrlegsstillettoheelsversionII.thumb.jpg.37fbd3aeb8e75792a41b04bfb8ec9257.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh dear!   I'm not so impressed with 'her' legs (and heels) now and propose to cross her off my next birthday party invitation list.   There are many other candidates waiting. ;)

[My carer has just told me that I have been asleep, and dreaming in a disturbed manner.   Have I missed anything?   :o

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Emily Ratajkowski was her usual flawless self at the premiere of her new film I Feel Pretty in Westwood, California on Tuesday.

The 26-year-old model, who shot to fame appearing in Robin Thicke's Blurred Lines video in 2013, wore a black sequined gown with long sleeves, a slit up the leg and a large portion cut out of the midsection, revealing her taut abs.

Ratajkowski, who has more than 17.3 million Instagram followers, rounded out her glamorous ensemble with diamond earrings and black high heels, wearing her silky brown tresses down and parted in the middle."

 

4B44070100000578-5628295-On_the_rise_The4B44076300000578-5628295-Anniversary_It_

 

This video is NOISY! You might want to turn sound off, if you have it "on" usually.

http://video.dailymail.co.uk/video/mol/2018/04/18/1221069207784501869/640x360_MP4_1221069207784501869.mp4

Included only to show what Emily looks like when she moves.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes - I recognise the 'Victoria' label now.   The shoes she is wearing in the last pic seem to buck the trend for having set-back heels; they look to be set more forward than usual (although that was a style adopted in the earliest (mid-50s) stilettos).   Stilettos should be in a mid-position (under the back of the wearer's heel) for both style and comfort!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Puffer said:

The shoes she is wearing in the last pic seem to buck the trend for having set-back heels; they look to be set more forward than usual (although that was a style adopted in the earliest (mid-50s) stilettos).   Stilettos should be in a mid-position (under the back of the wearer's heel) for both style and comfort!

I have a(n older - cheap) pair in black suedette. The heel rise measures 5 inches, but sooooooooo easy to walk in because of the heel position. As they are so easy to walk in, I almost never wear them. :rolleyes:

Edited by FastFreddy2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 months later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...