Jump to content
FastFreddy2

Something special

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, Puffer said:

Are you sure?   I'd never heard of HD and, looking at what is online, she doesn't seem to resemble much the pic I posted above - which seems to show a much more attractive and less artificial woman than HD's pics reveal.   (And I doubt very much whether HD is '100% woman' - at least 10% of her is silicone!) 

yep.  she's a full time model & instagram queen.  She has 1001 "looks" so obviously not all photos are going to resemble yours. many of them do though, including the slight 'asian' look that she sometimes has.  the look that had Freddy thinking back to his ''holidays' in Bangkok  :D

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, euchrid said:

She's Holly Deacon---

https://www.instagram.com/hollydeacon/?hl=en

100% woman, so you can fap away with impunity.  Sorry she isn't to your "taste" Freddy :o:lol:

 

14 hours ago, FastFreddy2 said:

Nope .... Just thought I'd mention it ... In case anyone was getting 'carried away' .... ;) :D

I can't imagine a more 'perfect' looking set of legs, standing underneath a slim/trim body. Things that look too good to be true, usually are. :(

I have no idea how "I can't imagine a more "perfect" looking set of legs" could be interpreted to mean I don't like them? They are stunning. 

 

 

3 hours ago, euchrid said:

yep.  she's a full time model & instagram queen.  She has 1001 "looks" so obviously not all photos are going to resemble yours. many of them do though, including the slight 'asian' look that she sometimes has.  the look that had Freddy thinking back to his ''holidays' in Bangkok  :D

 

I wish! ;) :D

 

Usually you 'nail' these obtuse enigma's but this time I'm not sure. (If anyone else had made the claim I would have given it no credit at all.) 

Looking back at Puffer's original, I immediately noticed the boyish tummy. It's not big, but it suggests one more rib than woman usually have. The backside is a nice shape, but the bum/hips are slim, not usually seen on a woman, and certainly not on a Western woman unless she's from Poland.

The lips on the original are almost full, but not overly so. Those on H.D. are positively pneumatic, and her nose is very long/straight which is doubtless that way due to the plastic in it.  Which leads us on to the photo style of DH which appears to be a "tits and arse" show. (And why not?) And of the 4-500 photographs I browsed, none had 'legs' as a point of interest, but plenty were showing T+A which then also suggested a small waist? Something not seen in  the first image.

If that initial picture is one of DH, I would expect multiple 'hits' from Google, but nothing found?

 

At the moment (Watson), I remain unconvinced. :(

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, euchrid said:

i've changed my mind.  she's not Holly Deacon.

She's Brittany Hawks  https://www.instagram.com/brittany_hawks/?hl=en

 

8dcc45e7cc7a0bb1efaeb2c514dc75a7.jpg

 

Closer, but still no prize. :D Brittany has blue/grey eyes .... 

 

On 12/04/2018 at 1:44 PM, Puffer said:

I don't know who this is - and don't really care (unless she happens to live in the next street):

5ad17f334a777_tumblrlegsstillettoheels.thumb.jpg.4e0fd769b824424f12bb0e0e52a445c1.jpg

 

I'm not (yet) a member of 'tumblr', but I did try to look at the accounts of a few of those that are, who had "liked" this image. While at least one took me to porn, two others took me to fe(male) images .... I'm even more convinced 'we' are looking at someone with a full-set of ribs. ;)

Edited by FastFreddy2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

18910188_uzHLv.jpegetek-stiletto-kombini.jpg

 

Stumbled across these while searching for a lead on our mystery (wo)man ...

 

5ad1923fd3682_Bumandlegs.jpg.833bf1d6bdb781a8ec910f3603299792.jpg

 

Curvy (got waist and bum) Asian lady. That said, her backside could well be enhanced;)

Edited by FastFreddy2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 14/04/2018 at 5:03 AM, FastFreddy2 said:

 

Closer, but still no prize. :D Brittany has blue/grey eyes .... 

...

I'm not (yet) a member of 'tumblr', but I did try to look at the accounts of a few of those that are, who had "liked" this image. While at least one took me to porn, two others took me to fe(male) images .... I'm even more convinced 'we' are looking at someone with a full-set of ribs. ;)

I suggest that this correspondence should now cease, as:   (a) we are unlikely to establish with certainty who/what he/she/it truly is; (b) even if we do, none of us is ever likely to see/meet/shag him/her/it; (c) there are plenty more fish (genetically modified or not) in the sea. <_<

Now for a cold shower, whilst counting my blessings (and ribs) ...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

why were we ever talking about ribs???  men & women both have 12 pairs.

The "Eve was made from one of Adam's ribs" biblical fable bears no relation to actual human biology.  Freddy presumably attended Sunday School in his formative years.

Copy/paste from somewhere online -

THIS MYTH ABOUT WOMEN'S RIBS PERSISTS.   In an effort to prove the Bible story of Eve as wrought from Adam's rib "true," pastors and Sunday School teachers sometimes pass along a tale that women have more ribs than men. It's not true. Gender plays no part in the number of ribs you have: It's 12 pairs for everyone. However, women's ribs are about 10 percent smaller in volume on average than men's ribs.

Oh, and also re. the grey/blue eyes thing: Contact lenses?  photoshop?  I still reckon Brittany is the match.  She has too many photos online to search but i bet that 'street shot' is on her website somewhere.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mistaking smaller (-10%) for less, I thought women had fewer (for pregnancy). Oh well. :wacko:

And men often have ribs removed so they can attain a more feminine torso: Rodrigo Alves.

 

Anyway, if that image was anywhere other than hidden in a dark corner somewhere, Google/Bing/Pinterest would know about it. Rather like the images we post here. All available on a search. :huh:

 

Edited by FastFreddy2
Link added for Rodrigo Alves

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, FastFreddy2 said:

Anyway, if that image was anywhere other than hidden in a dark corner somewhere, Google/Bing/Pinterest would know about it. Rather like the images we post here. All available on a search. :huh:

 

I'm not sure that's at all correct.

Google Image, etc.are obviously quite clever technically, but they can be thrown off track by photo edits, changes to aspect ratio, addition of watermarks, cropping, colour tweaking, and so on.  TBO, I think Puffers "original" may have been photoshop-stretched since those lovely long legs do appear to be a bit too long to be "the real McCoy".

The original un-tampered photo probably exists all over the internet, however we don't have a copy of that one to use in our search requests. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, euchrid said:

Google Image, etc.are obviously quite clever technically, but they can be thrown off track by photo edits, changes to aspect ratio, addition of watermarks, cropping, colour tweaking, and so on.  TBO, I think Puffers "original" may have been photoshop-stretched since those lovely long legs do appear to be a bit too long to be "the real McCoy".

The original un-tampered photo probably exists all over the internet, however we don't have a copy of that one to use in our search requests. 

I agree, and maybe why that extra coloured block was put on the right of Puffers original. My version, has that removed. Here is a version with the image compressed. Any more compression and the image looked completely unnatural. 

 

 5ad4728993cd8_tumblrlegsstillettoheelsversionII.thumb.jpg.37fbd3aeb8e75792a41b04bfb8ec9257.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh dear!   I'm not so impressed with 'her' legs (and heels) now and propose to cross her off my next birthday party invitation list.   There are many other candidates waiting. ;)

[My carer has just told me that I have been asleep, and dreaming in a disturbed manner.   Have I missed anything?   :o

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"Emily Ratajkowski was her usual flawless self at the premiere of her new film I Feel Pretty in Westwood, California on Tuesday.

The 26-year-old model, who shot to fame appearing in Robin Thicke's Blurred Lines video in 2013, wore a black sequined gown with long sleeves, a slit up the leg and a large portion cut out of the midsection, revealing her taut abs.

Ratajkowski, who has more than 17.3 million Instagram followers, rounded out her glamorous ensemble with diamond earrings and black high heels, wearing her silky brown tresses down and parted in the middle."

 

4B44070100000578-5628295-On_the_rise_The4B44076300000578-5628295-Anniversary_It_

 

This video is NOISY! You might want to turn sound off, if you have it "on" usually.

http://video.dailymail.co.uk/video/mol/2018/04/18/1221069207784501869/640x360_MP4_1221069207784501869.mp4

Included only to show what Emily looks like when she moves.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Emily is a pretty girl, but I do NOT like that asymmetric (yuk!) cutout in her dress.   Her sandals are great, but marred by what appears to be a small platform - clumpiness clashing with delicacy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At least she is fully clothed. Something of an anomaly judging by the (PR) images I see of her most days.

She is gorgeous. :wub:  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure who she is but she was wearing rather nice shoes on BBC breakfast TV this morning:

image.png.850d15febb42d48df750b5a0308e1c54.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Victoria Fritz. 

 

 

1260117841_VictoriaFritz.thumb.jpg.bb95b9e801f265316d9f1ec23f55bec9.jpg

 

If you vaguely recollect reading about a presenter going into labour while on air, that would be Victoria. 

 

Edited by FastFreddy2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes - I recognise the 'Victoria' label now.   The shoes she is wearing in the last pic seem to buck the trend for having set-back heels; they look to be set more forward than usual (although that was a style adopted in the earliest (mid-50s) stilettos).   Stilettos should be in a mid-position (under the back of the wearer's heel) for both style and comfort!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
51 minutes ago, Puffer said:

The shoes she is wearing in the last pic seem to buck the trend for having set-back heels; they look to be set more forward than usual (although that was a style adopted in the earliest (mid-50s) stilettos).   Stilettos should be in a mid-position (under the back of the wearer's heel) for both style and comfort!

I have a(n older - cheap) pair in black suedette. The heel rise measures 5 inches, but sooooooooo easy to walk in because of the heel position. As they are so easy to walk in, I almost never wear them. :rolleyes:

Edited by FastFreddy2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Since I'm a Treker from way back, here's Jolene Blalock. (T'Pol, from Enterprise)

1118full-jolene-blalock.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×